Native or web
Usually low-risk. Test login, notifications, file handling, and device integration.
The Windows-to-Linux compatibility answer engine.
Apps
Look up the desktop apps that keep you on Windows and see the realistic Linux path for each one.
Loading compatibility data...
This accepts a Windows app list, a game list, or the name column from winget list. Netraverse will match what it knows, add the hits to your report, and surface the titles that still need data.
Add at least one app or game above to build your report.
Most failed Linux migrations are app migrations, not operating-system migrations. This checker separates first-party Linux clients, browser versions, Wine candidates, replacement apps, and VM-only workloads.
The readiness score (0–100) is the average migration difficulty of the apps and games you enter, adjusted for how you use the PC. 80+ means a full switch is realistic, 55–79 means a partial switch with a fallback for one or two workflows, and below 55 means keep Windows for now and remove blockers one at a time.
| Software | Linux verdict | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Microsoft Office | Use the web version | use the web version |
| Adobe Photoshop | Works via Wine | No official Linux build; community Wine installs are unstable and break on updates |
| QuickBooks | Use the web version | use the web version |
| Adobe After Effects | No Linux path yet | No Linux build and no working Wine path |
| Skype | No Linux path yet | Skype is discontinued as a consumer product |
The verdicts above come from the same engine — add your own apps and games in the checker for a personalised result.
Most failed Linux migrations are app migrations, not operating-system migrations. This checker separates first-party Linux clients, browser versions, Wine candidates, replacement apps, and VM-only workloads.
The page targets a specific user task: Check whether Office, Adobe, accounting and other Windows desktop apps run on Linux — native, web, Wine, or VM — and the best alternatives. The first screen gives the user an action immediately, while the supporting sections explain how to interpret the result, what decision the result supports, what to test next, and where to go deeper if a blocker appears.
A false yes happens when a user tests only easy software and ignores the one app or game that matters most. Start with the blocker candidates: office files with macros, Adobe projects, accounting data, CAD drawings, VPN/security tools, multiplayer games, anti-cheat titles, and device utilities.
Use the examples on this page as search starters, then replace them with your own list. Windows Apps on Linux Checker is most useful when the input matches the real machine, not an idealized version of the machine.
A strong result should lead to a controlled Linux test, not an immediate disk wipe. A mixed result should lead to a fallback plan for the risky items. A weak result should identify the few workflows that need replacement, VM support, dual-boot, cloud access, or another Windows device.
The next action is to open the detailed app and game pages behind any blocker. Those pages contain the method, breakage notes, migration risk, alternatives, and validation checklist needed to turn the tool result into a practical plan.
The quality of Windows Apps on Linux Checker depends on the list the user enters. The useful input is the exact software that would interrupt a normal week if it failed: the office suite, meeting tool, image editor, finance app, VPN, password manager, multiplayer title, launcher, or device utility.
For SEO and user value, this matters because the tool page answers a real task immediately. The input area, result model, interpretation guide, examples, and internal links all support one intent: decide what can move to Linux and what still needs Windows.
Trust the result after you have tested the highest-risk items yourself. Native and web apps still need sign-in and file checks. Wine paths need update and license checks. Games need launcher, save, controller, and anti-cheat checks. VM or dual-boot recommendations need storage, backup, and recovery planning.
The result from Windows Apps on Linux Checker is a planning artifact. Use it to choose the next experiment, not to skip the experiment. If a critical item is marked risky, open the detail page, read the notes, and test that item before changing the main disk.
Most failed Linux migrations are app migrations, not operating-system migrations. This checker separates first-party Linux clients, browser versions, Wine candidates, replacement apps, and VM-only workloads.
Usually low-risk. Test login, notifications, file handling, and device integration.
Possible, but fragile. Use this only after testing updates, plugins, and license activation.
Treat as a migration blocker unless a replacement app or browser workflow is acceptable.
Use the checker above, then open matching app or game pages for the full compatibility notes.
Use the checker above, then open matching app or game pages for the full compatibility notes.
Use the checker above, then open matching app or game pages for the full compatibility notes.
Use the checker above, then open matching app or game pages for the full compatibility notes.
Most failed Linux migrations are app migrations, not operating-system migrations. This checker separates first-party Linux clients, browser versions, Wine candidates, replacement apps, and VM-only workloads.
Usually low-risk. Test login, notifications, file handling, and device integration.
Possible, but fragile. Use this only after testing updates, plugins, and license activation.
Treat as a migration blocker unless a replacement app or browser workflow is acceptable.